1
00:00:01,160 --> 00:00:03,090
You have reached the end of a judgment,

2
00:00:03,100 --> 00:00:06,190
and you still cannot explain why the court

3
00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:09,450
decided the case. More
highlighting probably will not

4
00:00:09,460 --> 00:00:13,220
solve that. Try reading with
three different questions,

5
00:00:13,600 --> 00:00:15,760
then make a brief you can actually use.

6
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:18,000
First, get your bearings.

7
00:00:18,660 --> 00:00:20,900
Which court is this? Who are the parties?

8
00:00:21,380 --> 00:00:23,400
What happened before this hearing?

9
00:00:23,900 --> 00:00:26,870
What legal question is being decided, and what

10
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:29,620
is the result? These are separate boxes.

11
00:00:30,100 --> 00:00:32,020
Winning the appeal tells you the outcome;

12
00:00:32,340 --> 00:00:34,820
it does not, by itself, explain the reasoning.

13
00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:38,590
Here is an original fictional
teaching extract, not

14
00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:40,000
a real case you can cite.

15
00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:41,700
A review panel says:

16
00:00:42,140 --> 00:00:44,650
a request was rejected because it arrived after

17
00:00:44,660 --> 00:00:47,970
the deadline; the published
procedure allowed extra time

18
00:00:47,980 --> 00:00:49,880
where a specified condition was met;

19
00:00:50,260 --> 00:00:52,420
the panel had not considered that condition;

20
00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:55,010
the rejection must therefore be reconsidered.

21
00:00:55,020 --> 00:00:58,830
Notice the difference. 'The
request was rejected' is

22
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:02,290
background. 'The rejection must
therefore be reconsidered' is

23
00:01:02,300 --> 00:01:05,790
the result. The reasoning
connects the overlooked condition

24
00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,660
to the need for another decision.

25
00:01:08,140 --> 00:01:11,620
We are practising a reading method,
not stating a rule of UK law.

26
00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:14,120
Second, follow that connection.

27
00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:16,820
What proposition did the decision depend on?

28
00:01:17,180 --> 00:01:19,320
Which facts mattered to that proposition?

29
00:01:20,100 --> 00:01:22,410
Write the reasoning in your own words, and

30
00:01:22,420 --> 00:01:24,270
keep the paragraph reference beside it.

31
00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:27,150
If you cannot explain the connection, return to

32
00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:29,880
the passage rather than
collecting another quotation.

33
00:01:30,980 --> 00:01:33,960
Third, retrieve the details
your task actually needs.

34
00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:36,610
A seminar on procedure may need a different

35
00:01:36,620 --> 00:01:38,500
passage from an essay about the remedy.

36
00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:41,970
Do not assume every sentence
deserves equal space

37
00:01:41,980 --> 00:01:45,090
in your notes. Read the assigned material and

38
00:01:45,100 --> 00:01:46,830
follow the purpose of your course task.

39
00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:49,700
Now create a five-box brief:

40
00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:54,630
issue, material facts, decision,
reasoning, and relevance to

41
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:57,970
your topic. Add procedural
history or disagreement when

42
00:01:57,980 --> 00:02:00,730
it matters. A short first version is a

43
00:02:00,740 --> 00:02:04,440
discipline, not a rule that every
complex judgment fits half a page.

44
00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:08,910
Your turn. Which of those five boxes contains

45
00:02:08,920 --> 00:02:11,340
'the rejection must be reconsidered'?

46
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:12,980
Pause before answering.

47
00:02:17,460 --> 00:02:19,620
It belongs in the decision box.

48
00:02:19,920 --> 00:02:22,200
Explaining why belongs in reasoning.

49
00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:25,390
For a real authority, check
the original judgment

50
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:26,940
and your course materials.

51
00:02:27,620 --> 00:02:30,330
Multiple judgments and later
treatment can complicate the

52
00:02:30,340 --> 00:02:32,980
ratio. Use the brief to guide your reading,

53
00:02:33,100 --> 00:02:36,360
not replace it. The free
case-reading guide is linked below.
